Akehurst, L. & Vrij, A. (1999). Creating suspects in police interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 192–210.

Akehurst, L., Bull, R. & Vrij, A. (2000). Training British police officers, social workers and students to detect deception in children using criteria-based content analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Akehurst, L., Kohnken, G. & Hofer, E. (1995). The analysis and application of Statement Validity Assessment. Paper presented at the Fifth European Conference on Psychology and Law, Budapest, Hungary.

Akehurst, L., Kohnken, G., Vrij, A. & Bull, R. (1996). Lay persons' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 461–411.

Allen, J.J. B. & lacono, W. G. (1991). A comparison of methods for the analysis of event-related potentials in deception detection. Psychophysiology, 34, 234–240.

Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1991). Post-event information and reality-monitoring: when the witness cannot be honest. Paper presented at the First Spanish and British Meeting on Psychology, Law and Crime in Pamplona, Spain.

Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1992). Deception detection and Reality Monitoring: a new answer to an old question? In F. Losel, D. Bender & T. Bliesener (Eds), Psychology and law: international perspectives Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 328–332.

Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1996). Detecting fact from fallacy in child and adult witness accounts. In G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran & С Wilson (Eds), Psychology, law and criminal justice: international developments in research and practice. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 14–80.

Alonso-Quecuty, M. L., Hernandez-Fernaud, E. & Campos, L. (1991). Child witnesses: lying about something heard. In S. Redondo, V Garrido, J. Perez & R. Barbaret (Eds), Advances in psychology and law. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 129–135.

Anolli, L. & Ciceri, R. (1991). The voice of deception: vocal strategies of naive and able liars. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 259–284.

Anson, D. A., Golding, S. L. & Gully, K.J. (1993). Child sexual abuse allegations: reliability of criteria-based content analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 331341.

Apple, W., Streeter, L. A. & Krauss, R. M. (1919). Effects of pitch and speech rate on personal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 115–121.

Arntzen, E. (1982). Die Situation der Forensischen Aussagenpsychologie in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: the role of psychologists in criminal trials. Deventer: Kluwer, 101–120.

Arntzen, F. (1983). Psychologic der Zeugenaussage: Systematik der Glaubwiirdig-keitsmerkmale. Munich: С. H. Beck. Aune, R. K., Levine, T. R., Ching, P. U. & Yoshimoto, J. M. (1993). The influence of perceived source reward value on attributions of deception.Communication Research Reports, 10, 15–21.

Backbier, E. & Sieswerda, S. (1991). Wanneer en waarom liegen we eigenlijk? NederlandsTijdschrift voorde Psychologie, 52, 255–264.

Barland, G. H. (1984). Standards for the admissibility of polygraph results as evidence. University of West Los Angeles Law Review, 16, 31–54.

Barland, G. H. (1988). The polygraph test in the USA and elsewhere. In A. Gale (Ed.), The polygraph test: lies, truth and science. London: Sage Publications, 13–96.

Bashore, T. R. & Rapp, RE. (1993). Are there alternatives to traditional polygraph procedures? Psychological Bulletin, 113, 3-22.

Baskett, G. D. & Freedle, R. O. (1914). Aspects of language pragmatics and the social perception of lying.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3, 111–131.

Bell, B. E. & Loftus, E. F. (1988). Degree of detail of eyewitness testimony and mock juror judgments./oMrtta/ of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1111–1192.

Bell, B. E. & Loftus, E. E. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: the power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56,669–619.

Bell, K. L. & DePaulo, В. M. (1996). Liking and lying.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 243–266.

Ben-Shakhar, G. & Dolev, K. (1996). Psychophysiological detection through the Guilty Knowledge technique: effects of mental countermeasures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 213–281.

Ben-Shakhar, G. & Furedy J.J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Blaauw, J. A. (1911). 99 tips voor het verhoor.Algemeen Politie Blad, 120, 281–296.

Boelhouwer, A. J. W., Merckelbach, H. L. G. J., Van Koppen, P. J. & Verbaten, M. N. (1996). Leugendetectie in Nederland (Rapport aan Minister van Justitie). Tilburg: University of Tilberg.

Bond, C. F. & Fahey, W. E. (1981). False suspicion and the misperception of deceit. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 41–46.

Bond, C. E & Robinson, M. (1988). The evolution of deception.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 295–301.

Bond, C. E, Kahler, K.N. & Paolicelli, L. M. (1985). The miscommunication of deception: an adaptive perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 331–345.

Bond, С. E, Omar, A., Mahmoud, A. & Bonser, R.N. (1990). Lie detection across cultures. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 189–205.

Bond, С.Е., Omar, A., Pitre, U., Lashley, B.R., Skaggs, L.M. & Kirk, C.T. (1992). Fishy-looking liars: deception judgment from expectancy violation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 969911.

Boychuk, T. (1991). Criteria-Based Content Analysis of children's statements about sexual abuse: a field-based validation study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.

Bradley, M.T.& Janisse, M.P. (1981). Accuracy demonstrations, threat, and the detection of deception: cardiovascular, electrodermal and pupillary measures. Psychophysiology, 18, 301–315.

Bradley, M.T., MacLaren, V.V. & Black, M.E. (1996). The control question test in polygraphic examinations with actual controls for truth.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 155–162.

Brandt, D.R., Miller, G.R. & Hocking, J.E. (1980a). The truth-deception attribution: effects of familiarity on the ability of observers to detect deception. Human Communication Research, 6, 99-110.

Brandt, D.R., Miller, G.R. & Hocking, J.E. (1980b). Effects of self-monitoring and familiarity on deception detection. Communication Quarterly, 28, 3-10.

Brandt, D.R., Miller, G.R. & Hocking, J.E. (1982). Familiarity and lie detection: a replication and extension. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 216–290.

British Psychological Society (1986). Report of the Working Group on the use of the polygraph in criminal investigation and personnel screening. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 39, 81–94.

Brooks, C.I., Church, M.A. & Fraser, L. (1986). Effects of duration of eye contact on judgments of personality characteristics. The Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 11–18.

Brougham, C.G. (1992). Nonverbal communication: can what they don't say give them away? FBILaw Enforcement Bulletin, 61, 15–18.

Bull, R. (1988). What is the lie-detection test? In A. Gale (Ed.), The polygraph test: lies, truth and science. London: Sage Publications, 10–19.

Bull, R. (1989). Can training enhance the detection of deception? In J. С Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 83–91.

Bull, R. (1992). Obtaining evidence expertly: the reliability of interviews with child witnesses. Expert Evidence: The International Digest of Human Behaviour Science and Law, 1, 3-36.

Bull, R. (1995). Innovative techniques for the questioning of child witnesses, especially those who are young and those with learning disability. In M. Zaragoza et al. (Eds), Memory and testimony in the child witness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 119–195.

Bull, R. (1998). Obtaining information from child witnesses. In A. Memon, A. Vrij & R. Bull, Psychology and law: truthfulness, accuracy and credibility. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, 188–210.

Buller, D.B. & Aune, R.K. (1981). Nonverbal cues to deception among intimates, friends, and strangers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 269–289.

Buller, D.B., Burgoon, J.K., Busling, A.L. & Roiger, J.F. (1994a). Interpersonal deception. VIII. Further analysis of nonverbal and verbal correlates of equivocation from the Bauelas et al. (1990) research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 396–411.

Buller, D.B., Burgoon, J.K., White, C.H. & Ebesu, A.S. (1994b). Interpersonal deception. VII. Behavioral profiles of falsification, equivocation and concealment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 366–395.

Buller, D.B., Comstock, J„Aune, R.K. & Strzyzewski, K.D. (1989). The effect of probing on deceivers and truthtellers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 155110.

Buller, D.B., Stiff, J.B. & Burgoon, J.K. (1996). Behavioral adaptation in deceptive transactions. Fact or fiction: a reply to Levine and McCornack. Human Communication Research, 22, 589–603.

Buller, D.B., Strzyzewski, K.D. & Comstock, J. (1991a). Interpersonal deception.

I. Deceivers' reactions to receivers' suspicions and probing. Communication Monographs, 58, 1-24. Buller, D.B., Strzyzewski, K.D. & Hunsaker, EG. (1991b). Interpersonal deception.

II. The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectors. Communication Monographs, 58, 25–40.

deTurck, M.A. & Miller, G.R. (1985). Deception and arousal: isolating the behavioral correlates of deception. Human Communication Research, 12, 181–201.

deTurck, M.A. & Miller, G.R. (1990). Training observers to detect deception: effects of self-monitoring and rehearsal. Human Communication Research, 16, 603–620.

deTurck, M.A., Feeley, Т.Н. & Roman, L.A. (1991). Vocal and visual cue training in behavioural lie detection. Communication Research Reports, 14, 249–259.

deTurck, M.A., Harszlak, J.J., Bodhorn, DJ. & Texter, L.A. (1990). The effects of training social perceivers to detect deception from behavioural cues. Communication Quarterly, 38,189–199.

Dulaney, E.F. (1982). Changes in language behavior as a function of veracity. Human Communication Research, 9, 15–82.

Ebesu, A.S. & Miller, M.D. (1994). Verbal and nonverbal behaviors as a function of deception type. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 418–442.

Edinger, J.A. & Patterson, M.L. (1983). Nonverbal involvement and social control. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 30–56.

Ekman, P. (1981). Mistakes when deceiving. Annals of the Nebs York Academy of Sciences, 364, 269–218.

Ekman, P. (1988). Lying and nonverbal behavior: theoretical issues and new findings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12,163–116.

Ekman, P. (1989). Why lies fail and what behaviors betray a lie. In J. С Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 11–82.

Ekman, P. (1992). Telling lies: clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics and marriage. New York: W. W Norton.

Ekman, P. (1993). Why don't we catch liars? Social Research, 63,801–811.

Ekman, P. (1991). Deception, lying, and demeanor. In D. F. Halpern & A. E. Vois-kounsky (Eds), States of mind: American and post-soviet perspectives on contemporary issues in psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 93-105.

Ekman, P. & Frank, M. G. (1993). Lies that fail. In M. Lewis & С Saarni (Eds), Lying and deception in everyday life. New York: Guilford Press, 184–201.

Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry, 32,88-106.

Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1912). Hand movements.yoMraa/ of Communication, 22, 353–314.

Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1914). Detecting deception from the body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 288–298.

Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1982). Felt, false and miserable smiles. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6, 238–253.

Ekman, P. & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913–920.

Ekman, P., Davidson, R.J. & Friesen, W. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile: emotional expression and brain physiology. II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58,342–353.

Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V. & O'Sullivan, M. (1988). Smiles when lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 414–420.

Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., & Scherer, K.R. (1916). Body movement and voice pitch in deceptive interaction. Semiotica, 16, 23–21.

Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., Friesen, W. V. & Scherer, K. (1991). Face, voice, and body in detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 125–135.

Elaad, E. (1990). Detection of guilty knowledge in real-life criminal investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 15, 521–529.

Elaad, E. (1993). Detection of deception: a transactional analysis perspective./owma/ of Psychology, 121,5-15.

Elaad, E. (1991). Polygraph examiner awareness of crime-relevant information and the guiltyknowledge test. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 101–120.

Elaad, E. & Ben-Shakhar, B. (1991). Effects of item repetitions and variations on the efficiency of the guilty knowledge test. Psychophysiology, 34, 581–596.

Elaad, E., Ginton, A. & Jungman, N. (1992). Detection measures in real-life criminal guilty knowledge tests.Journal of Applied Psychology, 11, 151–161.

Elaad, E., Ginton, A. & Shakhar, G. (1994). The effects of prior expectations and outcome knowledge on polygraph examiners' decisions.Journal of Behavioral Decision-Making, 7, 219–292.

Esplin, PW, Boychuk, T & Raskin, D.C. (1988). Afield validity study of Criteria-Based Content Analysis of children's statements in sexual abuse cases. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Credibility Assessment in Maratea, Italy, June 1988.

Exline, R., Thibaut,J., Rickey, C. & Gumpert, P. (1910). Visual interaction in relation to machiavellianism and an unethical act. In P. Christie & F. Geis (Eds), Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press, 53–15.

Eysenck, H.J. (1984). Crime and personality. In D.J. Muller, D. E. Blackman & A. J. Chapman (Eds), Psychology and law. New York: John Wiley, 85-100.

Faigman, D. L., Kaye, D., Saks, M. J. & Sanders, J. (1991). Modem scientific evidence: the law and science of expert testimony. St Paul, MN: West.

Farwell, L. A. & Donchin, E. (1991). The truth will come out: interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 28,531–541.

Feeley, Т. H. & deTurck, M. A. (1991). Perceptions of communication as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer: the case of lie detection. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, 1991.

Feeley, Т. H. & deTurck, M. A. (1998). The behavioral correlates of sanctioned and unsanctioned deceptive communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22,189–204.

Feeley, T. H. & Young, M.J. (1991). Detecting deceptive communication: a narrative review. Unpublished manuscript.

Feeley, T. H., deTurck, M. A. & Young, M.J. (1995). Baseline familiarity in lie detection. Communication Research Reports, 12,160–169.

Feldman, R. S., Jenkins, L. & Popoola, O. (1919). Detection of deception in adults and children via facial expressions. Child Development, 50, 350–355.

Fiedler, K. & Walka, I. (1993). Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research, 20,199–223.

Fisher, R. P. & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: the cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Flavell, J. FL, Botkin, P. T, Fry, С. K., Wright,J. С &Jarvis, P. T. (1968). The development of role-taking and communication skills in children. New York: John Wiley.

Foley, M.A. & Johnson, M.K. (1985). Confusions between memories for performed and imagined actions: a developmental comparison. Child Development, 56,1145–1155.

Ford, Ch. V. (1995). Lies! Lies!! Lies.!! The psychology of deceit. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

Frank, M.G. & Ekman, P. (1991). The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 1429–1439.

Freedman, J. L. Adam, E. K., Davey, S. A. & Koegl, C.J. (1996). The impact of a statement: more detail does not always help. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1, 111–130.

Freud, S. (1959). Collected papers. New York: Basic Books.

Fugita, S. S., Wexley, K. N. & Hillery, J. M. (1914). Black-white differences in nonverbal behavior in an interview setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4,343–351.

Furedy, J.J. (1991a). Alice in Wonderland terminological usage in, and communicational concerns about, that peculiar flight of technological fancy: the CQT polygraph. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26, 241–241.

Furedy, J.J. (1991b). On the validity of the polygraph. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26, 211–213.

Furedy, J. J. (1993). The «control» question «test» (CQT) polygrapher's dilemma: logico-ethical considerations for psychophysiological practitioners and researchers..International Journal ofPsychophysiology, 15, 263–261.

Furedy, J. J. (1996a). Some elementary distinctions among, and comments concerning, the «control» question «test» (CQT) polygrapher's many problems: a reply to Honts, Kircher and Raskin. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 22, 53–59.

Furedy, J. J. (1996b). The North American polygraph and psychophysiology: disinterested, uninterested, and interested perspectives. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 91-105.

Furedy, J. J. & Heslegrave, R.J. (1988). Validity of the lie detector: a psychophysiological perspective. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 219–246.

Gale, A. (1988). The polygraph test, more than scientific investigation. In A. Gale (Ed.), The polygraph test: lies, truth and science. London: Sage, 1–9.

Garratt, G. A., Baxter, J. C. & Rozelle, R. M. (1981). Training university police in black-American nonverbal behavior.Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 211–229.

Garrido, E., Masip, J., Herrero, C., Tabernero, С & Vega, M.T. (1998). Policemen's ability to discern truth from deception. Unpublished manuscript.

Ginton, A., Daie, N., Elaad, E. & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1982). A method for evaluating the use of the polygraph in a real-life situation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61,131–131.

Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: experiments in spontaneous speech. New York: Doubleday.

Goodman, G. S. & Schwartz-Kenney (1992). Why knowing a child's age is not enough: influences of cognitive, social, and emotional factors on children's testimony. In H. Dent & R. Flin (Eds), Children as witnesses. Chichester: John Wiley, 15–32.

Goodman, G. S., Rudy, L., Bottoms, B. & Aman, C. (1990). Children's concerns and memory: issues of ecological validity in the study of children's eyewitness testimony. In R. Fivush & J. Hudson (Eds), Knowing and remembering in young children. New York: Cambridge University Press, 249–284.

Gordon, R.A., Baxter, J.C, Rozelle, R.M., & Druckman, D. (1981). Expectations of honest, evasive and deceptive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 121,231–233.

Gordon, B. N., Schroeder, С. S. & Abrams, J. M. (1990). Age and social class differences in children's knowledge of sexuality.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 19,33–43.

Granhag, P.A. & Stromwall, L.A. (1998). «Let's go over this again»: effects of repeated interrogations on deception detection performance. Paper presented at the Eighth European Conference on Psychology and Law, Cracow, Poland, September 1998.

Greene, J.O., O'Hair, H.D., Cody, MJ. & Yen, С. (1985). Planning and control of behavior during deception. Human Communication Research, 11, 335–364.

Greuel, L. (1992). Police officers' beliefs about cues associated with deception in rape cases. In F. Losel, D. Bender & T Bliesener (Eds), Psychology and law: international perspectives. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 234–239.

Gudjonsson, G. H. (1992). The psychology of interrogations, confessions and testimony. Chichester: John Wiley.

Hale, J. L. & Stiff, J. B. (1990). Nonverbal primacy in veracity judgments. Communication Reports, 3, 15–83.

Hall, J. A. (1919). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85,845–851.

Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Hemsley, G. D. & Doob, A. N. (1918). The effect of looking behavior on perceptions of a communicator's credibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8,136–144.

Hernandez-Fernaud, E. & Alonso-Quecuty, M. (1991). The cognitive interview and lie detection: a new magnifying glass for Sherlock Holmes? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 55–68.

Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J. & Esplin, P.W. (1991). The relationships among interviewer utterance type, CBCA scores and the richness of children's responses.Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2, 169–116.

Hocking, J. E. & Leathers, D. G. (1980). Nonverbal indicators of deception: a new theoretical perspective. Communication Monographs. 41,119–131.

Hrfer, E. & Kohnken, G. (1999) Assessingthe credibility of witness statements. Paper presented at the Ninth European Conference on Psychology and Law, Dublin, Ireland, July 1999.

Hrfer, E., Akehurst, L. & Metzger, G. (1996). Reality monitoring: a chance for further development of CBCA? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the European Association on Psychology and Law in Sienna, Italy, August 1996.

Hrfer, E., Kohnken, G., Hanewinkel, R. & Bruhn, C. (1993). Diagnostik and attribution vonglaubwiirdigkeit. Kiel: Final report to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, КО 882/4-2 Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel.

Honts, C. R. (1991). The emperor's new clothes: the application of the polygraph tests in the American workplace. Forensic Reports, 4,91-116.

Honts, С. R. (1994). Assessing children's credibility: scientific and legal issues in 1994. North Dakota Law Review, 10, 819–903.

Honts, C. R. (1995). The polygraph in 1995: progress in science and the law.North Dakota Law Review, 11, 981-1020.

Honts, С. R. (1996). Criterion development and validity of the TKB in field application.Journal of General Psychology, 123, 309–324.

Honts, C.R. & Perry, M.V. (1992). Polygraph admissibility: changes and challenges. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 351–319.

Honts, С R. & Raskin, D. С. (1988). A field study of the validity of the directed lie control question. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 16, 56–61.

Honts, С R., Devitt, M. K, Winbush, M. & Kircher J. С. (1996). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of the concealed knowledge test. Psychophysiology, 33,84–92.

Honts, C. R., Modes, R. L. & Raskin, В. С. (1985). Effects of physical counter-measures on the physiological detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 10,111–181.

Honts, C. R., Kircher, J. C. & Raskin, В. С. (1996). Polygrapher's dilemma or psychologist's: a reply to Furedy's logico-ethical considerations for psychophysiological practitioners and researchers. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 20, 199–201.

Honts, С R., Raskin, В. С & Kircher, J. С. (1981). Effects of physical counter-measures and their electromyographic detection during polygraph tests for deception. Journal of Psychophysiology, 1, 241241.

Honts, C. R., Raskin, В. С & Kircher, J. С. (1994). Mental and physical counter-measures reduce the accuracy of polygraph tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 19,252–259.

Honts, C.R., Raskin, B.C., Kircher, J. С & Hodes, R. L. (1988). Effects of spontaneous countermeasures on the physiological detection of deception. JoMrrca/ of Police Science and Administration, 16, 9194. л

Horowitz, S. W. (1991). Empirical support for statement validity assessment. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 293–313.

Horowitz, S.W. (1998). Reliability of criteria-based content analysis of child witness statements: response to Tully. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 189–193.

Horowitz, ! S. W., Kircher, J. C, Honts, С R. & Raskin, В. С. (1991). The role of comparison questions in physiological detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 34,108–115.

Horowitz, S. W., Lamb, M. E., Esplin, P. W., Boychuk, Т. В., Krispin, O. & Reiter-Lavery, L. (1991). Reliability of criteria-based content analysis of child witness statements.Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2, 11–21.

Horowitz, S, W., Lamb, M. E., Esplin, P. W., Boychuk, Т. В., Reiter-Lavery, L. & Krispin, O. (1996). Establishing ground truth in studies of child sexual abuse. Expert Evidence: The International Digest of Human Behaviour Science and Law, 4,42–52.

Hunter, J. E., Gerbing, B. W. & Boster, F.J. (1982). Machiavellian beliefs and personality: construct invalidity of the Machiavellianism dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 12931305.

Hurd, K. & Noller, P. (1988). Becoding deception: a look at the process. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 211–233.

lacono, W. G. & Lykken, В. T. (1991). The validity of the lie detector: two surveys of scientific opinion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 426–433.

Ickes, W. (1984). Compositions in black and white: determinants of interaction in interracial dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 330–341.

Inbau, E E., Reid,J. E., & Buckley, J. P. (1986). Criminal interrogation and confessions. Baltimore, MB: Williams & Wilkins.

Jackson, J. (1996). Truth or fantasy: the ability of barristers and laypersons to detect deception in children's testimony. Paper presented at the AP-LS Biennial Conference, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, USA, March 1996.

Jones, В. P. H. & Krugman, R. (1986). Can a three-year-old child bear witness to her sexual assault and attempted murder? Child Abuse and Neglect, 10, 253–258.

Jones, B. P. H. & McGraw, J. M. (1981). Reliable and fictitious accounts of sexual abuse to children.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 21–45.

Jones, B. P. H. & McQuinston, M. (1989). Interviewing the sexually abused child-London: Gaskell. Johnson, M. K. (1988). Reality monitoring: an experimental phenomenological approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 390–394.

Johnson, M. & Foley, M. A. (1984). Bifferentiating fact from fantasy: the reliability of children's memory. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 33–50.

Johnson, M. K. & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 61–85.

Johnson, M.K. & Raye, C.L. (1998). False memories and confabulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2,131–145.

Johnson, M. M. & Rosenfeld, P.J. (1991). Oddball-evdked рЗОО-based method of deception detection in the laboratory. II. Utilization of non-selective activation of relevant knowledge. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 12, 289–306.

Johnson, M. K. & Suengas, A. G. (1989). Reality monitoring judgments of other people's memories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 101–110.

Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G. & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographicalevents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 311–316.

Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S. & Lindsay, B. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114,3-29.

Kalbfleisch, P. (1992). Beceit, distrust and the social milieu: application of deception research in a troubled world.Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20,308334.

Kalbfleisch, P.J. (1994). The language of detecting deceit. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 469–496.

Kalma, A., Witte, M. & Zaalberg, R. (1996). Authenticity: operationalization, manipulation, and behavioural components: an explanation. Medium Psychologic, 5,49–65.

Kashy, B. A. & BePaulo, В. M. (1996). Who lies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,!0,1031–1051.

Kassin, S. M. (1991). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52,221–233.

Kircher, J. C. & Raskin, В. С. (1988). Human versus computerized evaluations of polygraph data in a laboratory setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 13, 291–302.

Kircher, J. C., Horowitz, S. W. & Raskin, В. C. (1988). Meta-analysis of mock crime studies of the control question polygraph technique. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 19–90.

Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: a research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100,18-100.

Kleinmuntz, B. & Szucko, J. J. (1982). On the fallibility of lie detection. Law and Society Review, 11, 85104.

Kleinmuntz, B. & Szucko, J. J. (1984). Lie detection in ancient and modern times: a call for contemporary scientific study. American Psychologist, 39, 166–116.

Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. New York: Routledge.

Knapp, M. L., Hart, R. P. & Bennis, H. S. (1914). An exploration of deception as a communication construct. Human Communication Research, 1,15–29.

Kdinken, G. (1985). Speech and deception of eyewitnesses: an information processing approach. In F. L. Benmark (Ed.), The psychology of women. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 111–139.

Kdinken, G. (1981). Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements. Boes it work? Social Behaviour, 2, 1-11.

Kdinken, G. (1989). Behavioral correlates of statement credibility: theories, paradigms and results. In H. Wegener, F. Losel & J. Haisch (Eds), Criminal behavior and the justice system: psychological perspectives. New York-Springer-Verlag, 211–289.

Kdinken, G. (1990). Glaubwiirdigkeit: Untersuchungen zu einem psycholo-gischen konstrukt. Munich: Psychologie Verlags Union.

Kdinken, G. (1996). Social psychology and the law. In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds), Applied Social Psychology. London: Sage Publications, 251–282.

Kdinken, G. & Wegener, H. (1982). Zur Glaubwiirdigkeit von Zeugenaussagen: Experimentelle Uberprufungausgewahlter Glaubwiirdigkeitskriterien (Credibility of witness statements: experimental examination of selected reality criteria). Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie 29, 92-111.

Kdinken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A. & Bull, R. (in press). The cognitive interview: a metaanalysis. Psychology, Crime, and Law.

Kdinken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E. & Hofer, E. (1995). The cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adults' statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 611–684.

Koppelaar, L., Winkel, F.W. & Steen, J. C. van der (1986). Psychologische kant-tekeningen bij art 21 Sv.: een experiment rond etnische origine, ritmisch gedrag en verdacht zijn. Delikt en Delinkwent, 16, 25–38.

Krauss, R. M. (1981). Impression formation, impression management, and nonverbal behaviors. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman & M. P. Zanna (Eds), Social cognition: the Ontario Symposium. Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 323–341.

Kraut, R. E. (1918). Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception ofdying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 380–391.

Kraut, R. E. (1980). Humans as lie detectors: some second thoughts. Journal of Communication, 30, 209216.

Kraut, R. E. & Рое, D. (1980). On the line: the deception judgments of customs inspectors and laymen.Journa/ of Personality and Social Psychology, 36,380–391.

Kuhlman, M. S. (1980). Nonverbal communications in interrogations. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 49,6–9.

Lamb, M. E. (1998). Mea culpa but caveat emptor! Response to Tully. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3,193–195.

Lamb, M. E., Esplin, P. W. & Sternberg, K.J. (1995). Making children into competent witnesses: reactions to the Amicus Brief in re Michaels.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, i, 438–449.

Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W, Hovav, M., Manor, M. & Yudilevitch, L. (1996). Effects of investigative utterance types on Israeli children's responses. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19, 621–631.

Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K.J. & Esplin, P. W. (1994). Factors influencing the reliability and validity of statements made by young victims of sexual maltreatment.yoMrwa/of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 255–280.

Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y. & Hovav, M. (1991). Criterion-based content analysis: a field validation study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 21, 255–264.

Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., Hershkowitz, I. & Orbach, Y. (1991). Assessing the credibility of children's allegations of sexual abuse: a survey of recent research. Learning and Individual Differences, 9,115–194.

Lamers-Winkelman, F. (1995). Seksueel misbniik vanjonge kinderen: een onderzoek naar signalen en signaleren, en naar ondervragen en vertellen inzake seksueel misbniik. Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij.

Lamers-Winkelman, F. & Buffing, F. (1996). Children's testimony in the Netherlands: a study of Statement Validity Analysis. In B. L. Bottoms & G. S. Goodman (Eds), International perspectives on child abuse and children's testimony. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 45–62.

Landry, K. & Brigham, J. С. (1992). The effect of training in Criteria-Based Content Analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 663–615.

Lane, J. D. & DePaulo, В. M. (1999). Completing Coyne's cycle: dysphorics' ability to detect deception. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 311–329.

Larson, J. A. (1932). Lying and its detection: a study of deception and deception tests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Levine, T. R. & McCornack, S. A. (1992). Linking love and lies: a formal test of the McCornack and Parks model of deception detection.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9,143–154.

Levine, T. R. & McCornack, S. A. (1996a). A critical analysis of the behavioral adaptation explanation of the probing effect. Human Communication Research, 22,515–588.

Levine, T. R. & McCornack, S. A. (1996b). Can behavioral adaptation explain the probing effect?Human Communication Research, 22, 604–613.

Levine, T. R., McCornack, S. A. & Aleman, С G. (1991). Ask and you shall believe: behavioral adaptation, confidence, and heuristic-based explanations of the probing effect. Unpublished manuscript.

Levine, T. R., McCornack, S. A. & Park, H. S. (1999). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: documenting the "veracity effect". Communication Monographs, 66,125–144.

Lewis, M. (1993). The development of deception. In M. Lewis & C. Saarni (Eds), Lying and deception in everyday life. New York: The Guilford Press, 90-105.

Lindsay, D. S. & Johnson, M. K. (1981). Reality monitoring and suggestibility: children's ability to discriminate among memories from different sources. In S.J. Ceci, J. Toglia & D. F. Ross (Eds), Children's eyewitness memory. New York: Springer-Verlag, 91-121.

Littlepage, G. E. & Pineault, M. A. (1985). Detection of deception of planned and spontaneous communications. Journal of Social Psychology, 125,195–201.

Littmann, E. & Szewczyk, H. (1983). Zu einigen Kriterien und Ergebnissen foren-sisch-psychologischer Glaubwurdigkeitsbegutachtung von sexuell misbrauchten Kindern und Jugendlichen. Forensia, 4, 55–12.

Loftus, E. F. & Palmer, J. C. (1914). Reconstructions of automobile destruction: an example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585589.

Lord, C. G., Ross, L. & Lepper, M. R. (1919). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 2098–2109.

Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385–388.

Lykken, D. T. (1960). The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: the effects of faking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 258–262.

Lykken, D. T. (1988). The case against polygraph testing. In A. Gale (Ed.), The polygraph test: lies, truth, and science. London: Sage, 111–126.

Lykken, D. T. (1991). Why (some) Americans believe in the lie detector while others believe in the Guilty Knowledge Test. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 126,214–222.

Lykken, D. T. (1998). A tremor in the blood: uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York: Plenum Press.

McClintock, C.C. & Hunt, R.G. (1915). Nonverbal indicators of affect and deception in an interview setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 54–61.

McCornack, S. A. (1991). The generation of deceptive messages: laying the groundwork for a viable theory of interpersonal deception. In J. G. Greene (Ed.), Message production: advances in communication theory. Mahwah, N J Erlbaum, 91-126.

McCornack, S. A. & Levine, T. R. (1990). When lovers become leery: the relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception. Communication Monographs, 51,219–230.

McCornack, S. A. & Parks, M. R. (1986). Deception detection and relationship development: the other side of trust. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 9. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 311–389.

McCornack, S. A. & Parks, M. R. (1990). What women know that men don't: sex differences in determining truth behind deceptive messages. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 101–118.

McCroskey, J. C. & Mehrley, S. (1969). The effects of disorganization and nonfluency on attitude change and source credibility. Speech Monographs, 36, 13–21.

Mann, S., Vrij, A. & Bull, R. (1998). Telling and detecting true lies. Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Meeting of the European Association on Psychology and Law in Cracow, Poland, September 1998.

Manstead, A. S. R., Wagner, H. L. & MacDonald, C.J. (1986). Deceptive and non-deceptive communications: sending experience, modality, and individual abilities. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10, 141–161.

Manzanero, A. L. & Diges, M. (1996). Effects of preparation on internal and external memories. In G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M.

McMurran & C. Wilson (Eds), Psychology, law, and criminal justice: international developments in research and practice. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 56–63.

Markham, R. (1991). Development of reality monitoring for performed and imagined actions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 12,1341–1354.

Maxwell, G. M., Cook, M. W & Burr, R. (1985). The encoding and decoding of liking from behavioral cues in both auditory and visual channels.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9,239–264.

Mehrabian, A. (1912). Nonverbal communication. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton. Meitai Fan, R.,

Wagner, H. L. & Manstead, A. S. R. (1995). Anchoring, familiarity, and confidence in the detection of deception. Baste and Applied Social Psychology, 11,83–96.

Memon, A. (1998). Telling it all: the Cognitive Interview. In A. Memon, A. Vrij & R. Bull, Psychology and law: truthfulness, accuracy and credibility. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, 110–188.

Memon, A. &-Bull, R. (1999). Handbook of the psychology of interviewing. Chichester: John Wiley.

Merckelbach, H. L. G. J. (1990). Leugendetector kan gevaarlijk zijn. Intermediair, 26,35–31.

Metts, S. (1989). An exploratory investigation of deception in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6,159–119.

Millar, M. G. & Millar, K. (1995). Detection of deception in familiar and unfamiliar persons: the effects of information restriction. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19, 69–84.

Millar, M. G. & Millar, K. (1991). Effects of situational variables on judgments about deception and detection accuracy. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 401410.

Miller, G. R., Bauchner, J. E., Hocking, J. E„Fontes, N. E., Kaminski, E. P. & Brandt, D. R. (1981)."…and nothing but the truth". In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Perspectives in laze and psychology. Vol. II: The trial process. New York: Plenum, 145–119.

Miller, G. R., deTurck, M. A. & Kalbfleisch, P.J. (1983). Self-monitoring, rehearsal, and deceptive communication. Human Communication Research, 10, 91-111.

Miller, G. R., Mongeau, P. A. & Sleight, С. (1986). Fudging with friends and lying to lovers: deceptive communication in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 495–512.

Milne, R. & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: psychology and practice. Chichester: John Wiley.

Mitchell, R. W. (1986). A framework for discussing deception. In R. W. Mitchell & N. S. Mogdil (Eds), Deception: perspectives on human and nonhuman deceit. Albany: State University of New York Press, 3–4.

Moston, S. (1981). The suggestibility of children in interview studies. Child Language, 1,61–18.

Mulder, M. & Vrij, A. (1996). Explaining conversation rules to children: an intervention study to facilitate children's accurate responses. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 623–631.

Myers. B. & Arbuthnot, J. (1991). Polygraph testimony and juror judgments: a comparison of the guilty knowledge test and the control question test.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1421–1431.

Neisser, U. (1981). John Dean's memory: a case study. Cognition, 9, 1-22.

Nigra, G. N„Buckley, M. A., Hill, D. E. & Nelson, J. (1989). When juries «hear» children testify: the effects of eyewitness age and speech style on juror's perceptions of testimony. In S.J. Ceci, D. E. Ross & M. P. Toglia (Eds), Perspectives on children's testimony. New York: Springer-Verlag, 51–10.

Ofshe, R. (1989). Coerced confessions: the logic of seemingly irrational action.Cultic Studies Journal, 6, 1-15.

O'Hair, H. D., Cody, M. & McLaughlin, M. L. (1981). Prepared lies, spontaneous lies, Machiavellianism and nonverbal communication.Human Communication Research, 1, 325–339.

Olsen, D. E., Harris, J. C, Capps, M. H. & Ansley N. (1991). Computerized polygraph scoring system. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42, 61–10.

O'Sullivan, M., Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1988). The effect of comparisons on detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 203–216.

O'Toole, D., Yuille, J. C, Patrick, C.J. & lacono, W G. (1994). Alcohol and the physiological detection of deception: arousal and memory influences. Psychophysiology, 31, 253–263.

Parham, I. A., Feldman, R. S., Oster, G. D. & Popoola, O. (1981). Intergenerational differences in nonverbal disclosure of deception. Journal of Social Psychology, 113,261–269.

Parker, J. F. (1995). Age differences in source monitoring of performed and imagined actions on immediate and delayed tests. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60,84-101.

Patrick, C.J. & lacono, W. G. (1991). Validity of the control question polygraph test: the problem of sampling bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 16, 229–238.

Peters, D. P. (1991). The influence of stress and arousal on the child witness. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 60–16.

Podlesney, J. A. (1995). A lack of operable case facts restricts applicability of the Guilty Knowledge Deception Detection Method in FBI criminal investigations FBI Technical Report, Quantico, VA.

Poole, D. A. & White, L. T. (1991). Effects of question repetition and retention interval on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 21,915–986.

Porter, S. & Yuille.J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: an investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443–459.

Pynoos, R. S. & Eth, S. (1984). The child as witness to homicide.Journal of Social Issues,40, 81-108.

Pynoos, R. S. & Nader, K. (1988). Children who witness the sexual assault of their mothers. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 21,561–512.

Raskin, D. С. (1919). Orienting and defensive reflexes in the detection of deception. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. Van Olst & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds), The orienting reflex in humans. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 581–605.

Raskin, D. С. (1982). The scientific basis of polygraph techniques and their uses in the judicial process. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past. Stockholm: Norsted & Soners, 311–311.

Raskin, D. C. (1986). The polygraph in 1986: scientific, professional, and legal issues surrounding acceptance of polygraph evidence. Utah Law Review, 29, 29–14.

Raskin, D. С (1988). Does science support polygraph testing? In A. Gale (Ed.), The polygraph test: lies, truth and science. London: Sage, 96-110.

Raskin, D. C. (1989). Polygraph techniques for the detection of deception. In D. C. Raskin(Ed.), Psychologicalmethods in criminalinvestigation and evidence. New York: Springer-Verlag, 241–296.

Raskin, D. С & Esplin, P. W. (1991a). Assessment of children's statements of sexual abuse. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 153–165.

Raskin, D. С & Esplin, P. W (1991b). Statement Validity Assessment: interview procedures and content analysis of children's statements of sexual abuse. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 265–291.

Raskin, D. C. & Hare, R. D. (1918). Psychopathy and detection of deception in a prison population. Psychophysiology, 15, 126–136.

Raskin, D. C, Kircher, J. C, Horowitz, S. W. & Honts, С R. (1989). Recent laboratory and field research on polygraph techniques. In J. С Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1-24.

Raye, С L. & Johnson, M. K. (1980). Reality monitoring vs. discrimination between external sources. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 405–408.

Reid, J. E. (1941). A revised questioning technique in lie detection tests. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 31, 542–541.

Reid, J. E. & Inbau, F. E. (1911). Truth and deception: the polygraph (lie detector) technique. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

Reis, H. Т., Senchak, M. & Solomon, B. (1985). Sex differences in the intimacy of social interaction: further examination of potential explanations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1204–1211.

Riggio, R. E. (1986). Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 649–660.

Riggio, R. E. & Friedman, H. S. (1983). Individual differences and cues to deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 899–915.

Riggio, R. E., Tucker, J. & Throckmorton, B. (1988). Social skills and deception ability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 568–511.

Roberts, K. P., Lamb, M. E., Zale.J. L. & Randall, D. W. (1998). Qualitative differences in children's accounts of confirmed and unconfirmed incidents of sexual abuse. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Redondo Beach, March 1998.

Robinson, W. P., Shepherd, A. & Heywood, J. (1998). Truth, equivocation/ concealment, and lies in job applications and doctor-patient communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11, 149–164.

Rockwell, P., Buller, D. B. & Burgoon.J. K. (1991). Measurement of deceptive voices: comparing acoustic and perceptual data. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 411–484.

Roediger, H. L. (1996). Memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35,16100.

Rosenfeld, P. J. (1995). Alternative views of Bashore and Rapp's (1993) alternative to traditional polygraphy: a critique. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 159–166.

Rosenfeld, P.J., Angell, A. Johnson, M. M. & QianJ. (1991). An ERP-based, control-question lie detector analog: algorithms for discriminating effects within individuals' average waveforms. Psychophysiology, 28, 319–335.

Rosenfeld, J. P., Reinhart, A. M., Bhatt, M., Ellwanger, J., Gora, K., Sekera, M. & Sweet, J. (1998). P300 correlates of simulated malingered amnesia in amatching-to-sample task: topographic analyses of deception versus truthtelling responses. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 28, 233–241.

Rosenthal, R. & DePaulo, В. M. (1919). Sex differences in eavesdropping on nonverbal cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 213–285.

Rosenthal, R. & Rubin, D. B. (1918). Interpersonal expectancy effects: the first 345 studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 311–415.

Rowatt, W. C., Cunningham, M. R. & Druen, P. A. (1998). Deception to get a date. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2A, 1228–1242.

Rozelle, R. M. & Baxter, J. С (1915). Impression formation and danger recognition in experienced police officers. Journal of Social Psychology, 96, 53–63.

Rozelle, R. M. & Baxter, J. С (1918). The interpretation of nonverbal behavior in a role-defined interaction sequence: the police-citizen encounter.Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 2,161–181.

Ruby, С L. & Brigham, J. C. (1991). The usefulness of the criteria-based content analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 105–131.

Ruby, C. L. & Brigham, J. C. (1998). Can Criteria-Based Content Analysis distinguish between true and false statements of African-American speakers? Law and Human Behavior, 22,369–388.

Ruva, C. & Bryant, J. B. (1998). The impact of age, speech style, and question form on perceptions of witness credibility and trial outcome. Paper presented at the AP-LS Biennial Conference, Redondo Beach, March 1998.

Saarni, C. (1984). An observational study of children's attempts to monitor their expressive behavior. Child Development, 55,1504–1513.

Saxe, L. (1991). Science and the TCB polygraph: a theoretical critique.Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26, 223–231.

Saxe, L. (1994). Detection of deception: polygraph and integrity tests.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 69–13.

Schneider, S. M. & Kintz, B. L. (1911). The effect of lying upon foot and leg movement. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 451–453.

Schooler, J. W., Gerhard, D. & Loftus, E. F. (1986). Qualities of the unreal.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 111–181.

Siegman, A. W. & Reynolds, M. A. (1983). Self-monitoring and speech in feigned and unfeigned lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45,1325–1333.

Sleek, S. (1998). Psychologists debate merits of the polygraph. Monitor, June 30.

Smith, A. (1983). Nonverbal communication among black female dyads: an assessment of intimacy, gender and race. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 55–61.

Smith, H. J., Archer, D. & Costanzo, M. (1991). "Just a hunch": accuracy and awareness in person perception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 3-19.

Soppe, H. J. G. (1995a). Getuigenissen van kinderen in zedenzaken 1: De herin-nering van kinderen en hoe hen te horen. De Psycholoog, 30, 213–219.

Soppe, H.J. G. (1995b). Getuigenissen van kinderen in zedenzaken 2: Bepaling van de geloofwaardigheid. De Psycholoog, 30, 261–265.

Soppe, H.J. G. (1991). Het verhoren van kinderen in zedenzaken. In P. J. Van Koppen, D. J. Hessing & H. F. M. Crombag (Eds), Het hart van de zaak: Psychologic van hetrecht. Deventer: Kluwer, 352–316.

Soppe, H.J. G. & Hees-Stauthamer, J. C. (1993). De geloofwaardigheid van getuigenissen van jeugdige slachtoffers van zedenmisdrijven. Tijdschrift voor Ontwikkelingspsychologie, 20, 1-25.

Sporer, S. L. (1991). The less traveled road to truth: verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 313–391.

Steller, M. (1989). Recent developments in statement analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment. Deventer: Kluwer, 135–154.

Steller, M. & Boychuk, T. (1992). Children as witnesses in sexual abuse cases: investigative interview and assessment techniques. In H. Dent & R. Flin (Eds), Children as witnesses. New York: John Wiley, 41–13.

Steller, M. & Kohnken, G. (1989). Criteria-Based Content Analysis. In D. С Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence. New York: Springer-Verlag, 211–245.

Steller, M. & Wellershaus, P. (1996). Information enhancement and credibility assessment of child statements: the impact of the cognitive interview on criteria-based content analysis. In G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran & C. Wilson (Eds), Psychology, law, and criminal justice: international developments in research and practice. Berlin: de Gruyter, 118–121.

Steller, M., Haenert, P. & Eiselt, W (1981). Extraversion and the detection of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 334–342.

Steller, M, Wellershaus, P. & Wolf, T. (1988). Empirical validation of Criteria-Based Content Analysis. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Credibility Assessment in Maratea, Italy, June 1988.

Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W, Redlich, A. & Sunshine, N. (1996). The relationship between investigative utterance types and the informativeness of child witnesses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 11,439–451.

Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Yudilevitch, L., Orbach, Y., Larson, C., Esplin, P. W. & Hovav, M. (in press). Effects of introductory style on children's abilities to describe experiences of sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect.

Stiff, J. B. & Miller, G. R. (1986). "Come to think of it…": interrogative probes, deceptive communication, and deception detection.Human Communication Research, 12, 339–351.

Stiff, J. В., Gorman, S., Krizek, B. & Snider, E. (1994). Individual differences and changes in nonverbal behavior: unmasking the changing faces of deception. Communication Research, 21, 555–581.

Stiff, J. В., Hale.J. L., Garlick, R. &Rogan, R. (1990). Effect of cue incongruence and social normative influences on individual judgments of honesty and deceit. Southern Communication Journal, 55, 206–229.

Stiff, J. В., Kim, H.J. & Ramesh, C. N. (1992). Truth biases and aroused suspicion in relational deception.Communication Research, 19, 326–345.

Stiff, J. В., Miller, G. R., Sleight, C, Mongeau, P., Garlick, R. & Rogan, R. (1989). Explanations for visual cue primacy in judgments of honesty and deceit.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 555–564.

Streeter, L. A., Krauss, R. M., Geller, V., Olson, С & Apple, W. (1911). Pitch changes during attempted deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 12–21.

Suengas, A. G. & Johnson, M. K. (1988). Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 311–389.

Taylor, R. & Vrij, A. (1999). The effects of varying stake and cognitive complexity on beliefs about the cues to deception. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Toris, C. & DePaulo, В. M. (1985). Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41,1063–1013.

Trankell, A. (1912). Reliability of evidence. Stockholm: Beckmans.

Tully, B. (1998). Reliability of criteria-based content analysis of child witness statements: Cohen's kappa doesn't matter. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3,183–188.

Undeutsch, U. (1961). Beurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Aussagen. In U. Undeutsch (Ed.), HandbuchderPsychologic. Vol. 11. ForensischePsychologie. Gottingem Hogrefe, 26-181.

Undeutsch, U. (1982). Statement reality analysis. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: the role of psychologists in criminal trials. Deventer: Kluwer, 21–56.

Undeutsch, U. (1984). Courtroom evaluation of eyewitness testimony.International Review of Applied Psychology, 33, 51–61.

Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 101–121.

Van Koppen, P.J., Boelhouwer, A.J. W., Merckelbach, H. L. G.J. & Verbaten, M. N. (1996). Leugendetectie in actie: Hetgebruik van depolygroaf in depraktijk. Leiden: Nederlands Studiecentrum Criminaliteit en Rechtshandhaving.

Van Rossum, W. (1998). Verschijnen voor de rechter: Hoe het hoort en het ritueel van Turkse verdachten in de rechtszaal. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij duizend en een.

Volbert, R. & Van der Zanden, R. (1996). Sexual knowledge and behavior of children up to 12 years: what is age-appropriate? In G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran & C. Wilson (Eds), Psychology, law, and criminal justice: international developments in research and practice. Berlin: de Gruyter, 198–216.

Vrij, A. (1991). Misverstanden tussenpolitie en allochtonen: Sociaal-psychologische aspecten van verdacht zijn. Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij.

Vrij, A. (1993a). Credibility judgments of detectives: the impact of nonverbal behavior, social skills and physical characteristics on impression formation. Journal of Social Psychology, 133,601-6 VI.

Vrij, A. (1993b). Students, prisoners and professional lie detectors' beliefs about verbal correlates of deception. Unpublished data.

Vrij, A. (1994). The impact of information and setting on detection of deception by police detectives. Journal of "Nonverbal Behavior, 18,111–131.

Vrij, A. (1995). Behavioral correlates of deception in a simulated police interview. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 129,15–29.

Vrij, A. (1996). De rechercheur als leugendetector: Een overzicht van onder-zoeken nar nonverbaal gedrag en misleiding. Modus: Tijdschrift voor Recherche en Forensische Wetenschappen, 5,4–9.

Vrij, A. (1991a). Detecting lies in partners, friends and strangers. Unpublished data.

Vrij, A. (1991b). Gender differences in self-oriented and other-oriented lies. Unpublished data.

Vrij, A. (1998a). Interviewing suspects. In A. Memon, A. Vrij & R. Bull, Psychology and law: truthfulness, accuracy and credibility. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, 124146.

Vrij, A. (1998b). Telling and detecting lies: some future directions in research. Forensic Update, 54,14–19.

Vrij, A. (1998c). To lie or not to lie. Psychologie, 11, 22–25.

Vrij, A. & Akehurst, L. (1996). Hand movements during deception: some recent insights. Paper presented at the Sixth European Conference on Psychology and Law. Italy, Sienna, August 1996.

Vrij, A. & Akehurst, L. (1998). Verbal communication and credibility: Statement Validity Assessment. In A. Memon, A. Vrij & R. Bull, Psychology and law: truthfulness, accuracy and credibility. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, 3-31.

Vrij, A. & Bull, R. (1992). Beliefs about verbal correlates of deception: British students. Unpublished data.

Vrij, A. & Fischer, A. (1995). The expression of emotions in simulated rape interviews. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 10, 64–61.

Vrij, A. & Graham, S. (1991). Individual differences between liars and the ability to detect lies. Expert Evidence: The International Digest of Human Behaviour Science and Law, 5,144–148.

Vrij, A. & Heaven, S. (1999). Vocal and verbal indicators of deception as a function of lie complexity. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 203–215.

Vrij, A. & Holland, M. (1999). Individual differences in persistence in lying and experiences while deceiving. Communication Research Reports, 3, 299–308.

Vrij, A. & Lochun, S. (1991). Neuro-lingui'stisch verhoren. In P. J. Van Koppen, D. J. Hessing&H. F. M. Crombag (Eds), Het hart van dezaak: Psychologie van het recht. Deventer: Kluwer, 493–505.

Vrij, A. & Mann, S. (in press). Lying when the stakes are high: deceptive behavior of a murderer during his police interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology.

Vrij, A. & Mann, S. (1999). Whokilled 'myrelative? Policeofficers 'abilityto detectreal-life high-stake lies. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Vrij, A. & Semin, G. R. (1996). Lie experts' beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 65–80.

Vrij, A. & Taylor, R. (1999). Pofice officers' and students' beliefs about telling and detecting little and serious lies. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Vrij, A. & Van Wijngaarden, J. J. (1994). Will truth come out? Two studies about the detection of false statements expressed by children. Expert Evidence: The International Digest of Human Behaviour, Science and Law, 3, 18–84.

Vrij, A. & Winkel, F. W. (1990). Culturele verschillen in spreekstijl van Surinamers en Nederlanders: De relatie tussen «zakelijkheid» en «misleiding»; bij een politieverhoor. Recht der Werkelijkheid, 11, 3-15.

Vrij, A. & Winkel, F. W. (1991). Cultural patterns in Dutch and Surinam j nonverbal behavior: an analysis of simulated police/citizen encounters.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 169–184.

Vrij, A. & Winkel, F. W. (1992a). Crosscultural police-citizen interactions: the influence of race, beliefs and nonverbal communication on impression formation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1546–1559.

Vrij, A. & Winkel, F. W. (1992b). Social skills, distorted perception and being suspect: studies in impression formation and the ability to deceive. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 8, 2–6.

Vrij, A. & Winkel, F. W. (1994). Perceptual distortions in cross-cultural interrogations: the impact of skin color, accent, speech style and spoken fluency on impression formation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 284–296.

Vrij, A., Akehurst, L. & Morris, P. M. (1991). Individual differences in hand movements during deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 81-102.

Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Van Dalen, D., Van Wijngaarden, J. J. & Foppes, J. H. (1996). Nonverbaal gedrag en misleiding. Tijdschrift voorde Politie, 58, 11–14.

Vrij, A., Dragt, A. W. & Koppelaar, L. (1992). Interviews with ethnic interviewees', nonverbal communication errors in impression formation. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 199–209.

Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K. P. & Bull, R. (1999). Detecting deceit via Criteria-Based Content Analysis, Reality Monitoring and analyses of nonverbal behaviour. Paper presented at the Ninth European Conference on Psychology and Law, Dublin, Ireland, July 1999.

Vrij, A., Foppes, J. H., Volger, D. M. & Winkel, F. W. (1992). Moeilijk te bepalen wie de waarheid spreekt: Non-verbaal gedrag belangrijkste indicator. Algemeen Politie Blad, 141,13–15.

Vrij, A., Kneller, W. & Mann, S. (in press). The effect of informing liars about Criteria-Based Content Analysis on their ability to deceive CBCA raters. Legal and Criminological Psychology.

Vrij, A., Semin, G. R. & Bull, R. (1996). Insight in behavior displayed during deception. Human Communication Research, 22, 544–562.

Vrij, A., Winkel, F. W. & Akehurst, L. (1991). Police officers' incorrect beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception and its consequences. In J. F. Nijboer & J. M. Reijntjes (Eds), Proceedings of the First World Conference on New Trends in Criminal Investigation and Evidence. Lelystad: Koninklijke Vermande, 221–238.

Vrij, A., Winkel, F. W. & Koppelaar, L. (1988). Culturele verschillen in nonverbaal gedrag: De persoonlijke ruimte van Nederlanders en Surinamers. Migranten-studies,4, 40–49.

Vrij, A., Winkel, F. W. & Koppelaar, L. (1991). Interactie tussen politiefunc-tionarissen en allochtone burgers: twee studies naar de frequentie en het effect van aan-en wegkijken op de impressieformatie. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 46, 8-20.

Wagenaar, W A. & Groeneweg, J. (1990). The memory of concentration camp survivors. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 11–81.

Walkley, J. (1985). Reading the suspect. Police Review, 93, 331–340.

Walters, S. B. (1996). Kinesic interview and interrogation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Waltman, J. L. (1983). Nonverbal communication in interrogation: some applications. Journal of Police and Science Administration, 11, 166–169.

Watson, D. C. & Sinka, В. K. (1993). Individual differences, social arousal and the electrodermal detection of deception. Personality and Individual Differences 15, 15–80.

Wells, G. L. & Leippe, M. R. (1981). How do triers of fact infer accuracy of eyewitness identification? Using memory of peripheral details can be misleading. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 682–681.

Wells, G. L. & Loftus, E. F. (1991). Commentary: is this child fabricating? Reactions to a new assessment technique. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections: Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 168–111.

West, I. (1992). Decision-making in the detection of deception. Paper presented to the British Psychology Society, Division of Criminological and Legal Psychology. Harrogate, March 1992.

Westcott, H. L., Davies, G. M. & Clifford, B. R. (1991). Adults' perceptions of children's videotaped truthful and deceptive statements. Children and Society, 5,123–135.

Wilson, D. S., Near, D. С & Miller, R. R. (1998). Individual differences in Machiavellianism as a mix of cooperative and exploitative strategies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 203–212.

Winkel, F. W & Vrij, A. (1995). Verklaringen van kinderen in interviews: Een experimenteel onderzoek naar de diagnostische waarde van Criteria Based Content Analysis. Tijdschrift voor Ontwikkelingspsychologie, 22,61–14.

Winkel, E W, Vrij, A., Koppelaar, L. & Van der Steen, J. (1991). Reducing secondary victimisation risks and skilled police intervention: enhancing the quality of police rape' victim encounters through training programmes. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 1,2-11.

Woodall, W G. & Burgoon, J. K. (1983). Talking fast and changing attitudes: a critique and clarification. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8,126–143.

Young, M. J. & deTurck, M. A. (1996). The effects of stress and coping on truthful and deceptive communication. Unpublished manuscript.

Yuille, J. С (1988a). A simulation study of criteria-based content analysis. Paper presented at the NATO advanced study institute on credibility assessment, Mara-tea, Italy, June 1988.

Yuille, J. С (1988b). The systematic assessment of children's testimony. Canadian Psychology, 29,241262.

Yuille, J. С & Cutshall, J. (1989). Analysis of statements of victims, witnesses, and suspects. InJ. С Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 115–191.

Zaparniuk, J., Yuille, J. С & Taylor, S. (1995). Assessing the credibility of true and false statements. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 18,343–352.

Zuckerman, M. & Driver, R. E. (1985). Telling lies: verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In A. W Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behaviors. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 129–141.

Zuckerman, M., DeFrank, R. S., Hall, J. A., Larrance, D. T. & Rosenthal, R. (1919). Facial and vocal cues of deception and honesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 318–396.

Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, В. M. & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 14. New York: Academic Press, 1-57.

Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R. & Alton, A. O. (1984). Learning to detect deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 519–528.

Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R. & Colella, M. J. (1985). Learning to detect deception from three communication channels. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9,188–194.

Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R. & Driver, R. (1981). Beliefs about cues associated with deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6,105–114.